Side-by-Side Comparison · March 2026

AI Detector Comparison

Six tools, one benchmark corpus, no affiliate arrangements.

#1
Originality.aioriginality.ai
Accuracy
91%
False Pos.
7%
Score
4.6/5
#2
GPTZerogptzero.me
Accuracy
87%
False Pos.
10%
Score
4.1/5
#3
Copyleakscopyleaks.com
Accuracy
79%
False Pos.
12%
Score
3.7/5
#4
Sapling AIsapling.ai
Accuracy
76%
False Pos.
17%
Score
3.2/5
#5
Writer.comwriter.com
Accuracy
84%
False Pos.
8%
Score
3.9/5
#6
Hive Moderationthehive.ai
Accuracy
88%
False Pos.
9%
Score
4.2/5
#ToolAccuracyFalse Pos.False Neg.LatencyPricingScore
#1 Originality.aioriginality.ai
91%
7% 11% 420ms paid 4.6/5
#2 GPTZerogptzero.me
87%
10% 15% 380ms freemium 4.1/5
#3 Copyleakscopyleaks.com
79%
12% 22% 510ms freemium 3.7/5
#4 Sapling AIsapling.ai
76%
17% 24% 610ms freemium 3.2/5
#5 Writer.comwriter.com
84%
8% 18% 290ms paid 3.9/5
#6 Hive Moderationthehive.ai
88%
9% 12% 340ms paid 4.2/5

How to Choose

For Maximum Accuracy: Originality.ai

Originality.ai leads at 91% accuracy with 7% FPR. Free plan, then credit-based pricing.

For Education: GPTZero

GPTZero is the standard in schools. 87% accuracy, free account, sentence-level highlighting.

For LMS Integration: Copyleaks

Copyleaks has the deepest Canvas, Moodle, and Blackboard integrations. AI detection in 30+ languages.

For Enterprise: Writer.com

Writer.comfastest API at 290ms. Full platform commitment required at $18/user/month.

For Voice & Deepfakes: Hive Moderation

Hive Moderation is the only tool that reliably detects AI-generated voice and video. API-only, enterprise pricing.

Key Metrics

Accuracy vs. False Positive Rate

A 91%-accurate detector with 7% FPR is safer than a 93%-accurate detector with 15% FPR: the latter falsely accuses twice as many innocent writers. For academic integrity, FPR is the critical metric.

See our full accuracy methodology for content-type breakdown.

False Positive Rates: The Critical Metric

A false positive occurs when an AI detector incorrectly classifies human-written text as AI-generated. For academic integrity contexts, this is the most consequential error: it means wrongly accusing a human writer. The best detectors have FPR of 7 to 10%; the worst are at 17 to 19%. Non-native English speakers and STEM writers are disproportionately affected across all tools tested.

API Latency for Production Pipelines

Latency matters when building detection into a real-time content workflow. Writer.com at 290ms enables near-instant inline detection. Copyleaks at 510ms introduces a half-second delay that accumulates at high throughput. For batch processing use cases, accuracy and cost matter more than latency.

Pricing Models Side by Side

Originality.ai uses a credit model (1 credit = 100 words) with a free plan, Pro at $14.95 a month and Enterprise at $179 a month. GPTZero offers a free account plus Premium (300,000 words a month) and Professional (500,000 words a month). Copyleaks bills credits (1 credit = 250 words) from $13.99 a month billed annually; Writer.com uses per-seat pricing. Prices checked 22 October 2026. Hive Moderation requires enterprise volume negotiation. See our pricing page for full comparison.

Head-to-head comparisons

Two detectors at a time, on the same 2,400 texts, with a decision table, pricing and worked examples. Also see the Sapling review.

Benchmark at a glance

Accuracy and false positive rate of six AI detectorsHorizontal bars: blue is overall accuracy, red is false positive rate, from the aidetector.ac benchmark (2,400 samples, March 2026). Originality.ai 91% accuracy, 7% false positives; Hive Moderation 88% accuracy, 9% false positives; GPTZero 87% accuracy, 10% false positives; Writer.com 84% accuracy, 8% false positives; Copyleaks 79% accuracy, 12% false positives; Sapling AI 76% accuracy, 17% false positives.Accuracy and false positive rate of six AI detectorsOriginality.ai91%Hive Moderation88%GPTZero87%Writer.com84%Copyleaks79%Sapling AI76%AccuracyFalse positive rate
Source: aidetector.ac accuracy benchmark, March 2026.